Perbedaan kemampuan komunikasi matematika siswa yang diajarkan dengan pendekatan open-ended berbantu alat peraga dan yang diajarkan dengan pendekatan ekspositori berbantu alat peraga pada materi operasi bilangan bulat dikelas VII SMP Negeri 37 Medan

Authors

  • Yulinar Lumban Gaol Pascsarjana UNIMED

Keywords:

open-ended approach, props-assisted expository approach, mathematical communication skills

Abstract

This study intends to determine differences in students' mathematical communication skills taught using the open-ended approach with the aid of teaching aids, expository assisted teaching aids and conventional approaches to integer operation material in class VII students. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 37 Medan, and three classes were selected, namely: class VII C as the experimental class 1 which was taught with an open approach assisted by teaching aids, class VII B as the experimental class. Class 2 is taught using an expository assisted approach with teaching aids and class VII A as a control class is taught conventionally. It turns out that Fcount> Ftable so that H0 is rejected, which means that there is a difference between the three samples. Because H0 was rejected, it was continued to the Tukey test. So it can be perceived that there is a significant comparison between the mathematical communication skills of students taught using the open-ended approach with the help of teaching aids, expository assisted teaching aids and conventional approaches to integer operation material for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 37 Medan, so it is hoped that the Open-ended approach End assisted teaching aids can be used as one of the preferences to improve students' mathematical communication skills.

References

Abdurahman, M. (2009). Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
AmilafiZone. (2013). Pendekatan Terbuka (Open-Ended Approach). http://google.co.id//PENDEKATANTERBUKA(OPEN-ENDEDAPPROACH) AmilafiZone.htm.
Ansari, Bansu. (2009). Komunikasi Matematika (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Banda Aceh : Pena.
Arif S. Sadiman, dkk. (2011). Media Pembelajaran, Pengertian, Pengembangan, dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arikunto, S. (2003). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Hamalik, O. (2005). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Hancock, Berenson. (1995). Enhancing Mathematics Learning With Open-Ended Question. The Mathematics Teacher. Vol. 88, No. 6, September 1995.
Hudojo, H. (2005). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang : UM PRESS.
Lindquist, M & Elliott, P.C. (1996). “Communication -an Imperative for Change: A Conversation with Mary Lindquist”, dalam Communication in Mathematics K-12 and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and EvaluatiOn Standarts for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Miftah, M. (2009).Komunikasi Efektif Dalam Pembelajaran.
http://www.mediapendidikan.net/index.php?option-com_content&view-article&i- d2:komunikasi
efektif&catid-1:pendidikan&1temid-2.
Muin, Abdul. (2006). "Pendekatan Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMA (Algoritma, vol. 2)." Jakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Nasution. (1985). Alat Peraga dalam Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Nohda, N. (2011). Learning and Teaching Trought Open Approach Method, Mathematics Education in Japan. Tokyo: TSME.
Paduppai, dkk. (2008). Penerapan Pendekatan Open-Ended dan Problem dalam Pembelajaran Kalkulus. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Vol. 14 : 904-925.
Russefendi. (1988). .Dasar-dasar Matematika Modern. Bandung : Tarsito.
Sagala. (2009). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sanjaya, Wina. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sinurat, Aldi. (2013). Pendekatan Open-Ended. http://google.co.id//CatatanKu-PendekatanOpen Ended.htm
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Sukino dan Wilson S. (2006). Matematika untuk SMP Kelas VII. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Syafruddin. (2008). Pendekatan Open Ended Problem dalam Matematika. http://www.psb-psma.org/content/blog/pendekatan-open-ended-problem-dalam-matematika.html.
Syaiful. (2009). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung : Alfabheta.
Syamsudin, M. (2008). Pembelajaran Matematika. http://www.google.co.id??search?hl=id&1strategi+pembelajaran+matematika&meta/
Tim MKPBM Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika. (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Bandung : JICA.
Trianto. (2010). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif. Jakarta : Kencana.
Whitin, DJ. & Whitin, P. (2000). "Exploring Mathematics Through Talking and Writing". In Burke, M.J. & Curcio, F.R. (Eds. 2000 Yearbook. Learning Mathematics For A New Century). USA: NCTM.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Gaol, Y. L. (2020). Perbedaan kemampuan komunikasi matematika siswa yang diajarkan dengan pendekatan open-ended berbantu alat peraga dan yang diajarkan dengan pendekatan ekspositori berbantu alat peraga pada materi operasi bilangan bulat dikelas VII SMP Negeri 37 Medan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5, 205–211. Retrieved from https://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/senatik/article/view/923

Issue

Section

Articles