Analysis Sociocultural Education Found in the Characters Aladdin 2019 film
Keywords:
Sociocultural Education, Characters, Film, Aladdin 2019Abstract
This final project is carried out to analysis sociocultural education found in the Aladdin 2019 character. The aims of this research are (1) to find out the sociocultural education found in the Aladdin 2019 film based on Vygotsky’s theory. (2) To find out what characters are found in the main character in the Aladdin 2019 film. The research methodology is descriptive qualitative research. The main sources of this research are the Aladdin 2019 film and script Aladdin 2019. The findings in this study indicate that: (1) there are five types of sociocultural education namely, leadership, friendliness, social concern, environmental concern, and responsibility. The most dominant social concern shown in this film is because of Aladdin’s background which is an orphan. (2) Whereas in the Aladdin character, five type were found, namely, helper, brave, responsible, trustworthy, and humble. With the contribution of film to learning, it can provide information about sociocultural education and character in cognitive development in children. Children’s cognitive development is an important thing to pay attention to because it is a part that requires very processes in the formation of memory and reasoning. Therefore, the role of the teacher is needed in this case. Teachers are expected to be able to use film media in learning so that students are interested in learning about sociocultural education and character.
References
Damono, Sapardi Djoko. 2006. “Pengarang, karya sastra dan pembaca.” LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra 1 (1).
Fadli, Muhammad Rijal. 2021. “Implementation of Sociocultural Based Character Education in Senior High School.” Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter 12 (2): 134–45.
Karima, Festi Himatu. 2016. “Woman Religious Rights’ Discrimination in King Mongkuts’ Era: an Anthropology Research with Feminist Approach in Novel Anna and the King written by Elizabeth Hand.” Eternal 7 (02): 45–53.
Kartika, Pheni Cahya. 2016. “Rasionalisasi Perspektif Film Layar Lebar Beradaptasi Karya Sastra.” Jurnal Pena Indonesia 2 (2): 142–58.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. “Metodologi penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi.”
Mudjiono, Yoyon. 2020. “Kajian Semiotika dalam film.” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 1 (1): 125–38.
Nurhana, Eni, dan Rr Festi Himatu Karima. 2022. “The Analysis Of Character Building Values Found In Aladdin 2019 Movie.” Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unipa Surabaya 18 (1): 106–23.
Puntambekar, Sadhana. 2022. “Distributed scaffolding: scaffolding students in classroom environments.” Educational Psychology Review 34 (1): 451–72.
Qin, Lili. 2022. “The ‘Wrong Love’ Between the Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding: An Interview With Prof. James P. Lantolf.” Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 45 (1): 138–49.
Saleh, Sirajuddin. 2017. “Analisis data kualitatif.”
Shabani, Karim. 2016. “Applications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach for teachers’ professional development.” Cogent education 3 (1): 1252177.
Suardipa, I Putu. 2020. “Sociocultural-revolution ala Vygotsky dalam konteks pembelajaran.” Widya Kumara: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 1 (2): 48–58.
Swain, Merrill, dan Sharon Lapkin. 2013. “A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate.” Journal of immersion and content-based Language education 1 (1): 101–29.
Tzuriel, David, dan David Tzuriel. 2021. “The Socio-Cultural Theory of Vygotsky.” Mediated Learning and Cognitive Modifiability, 53–66.
Wandansari, Rifky Aulia, dan Valentina Widya Suryaningtyas. 2022. “Portrayals of Power in Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games and Veronica Roth’s Divergent Novels: A Comparative Study.” power 2 (1): 10–25.
Xi, Jiao, dan James P Lantolf. 2021. “Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 51 (1): 25–48.
