Analisis penerapan pendekatan STEM untuk mengatasi rendahnya kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi bangun ruang sisi lengkung (tabung)
Keywords:
STEM, creative thinking, cylinderAbstract
This study aims to determine that the STEM approach can overcome the low ability to think creatively by applying the STEM approach how the steps of the STEM approach are used in the learning process about material on curved face three dimensional object (cylinder). The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. This study used a purposive sampling and data collection techniques used are observation, creative thinking skills tests, and interviews. The instruments used in this study are observation sheets, test sheets of students' creative thinking skills on the material of curved face three dimensional object (cylinder), and interview guidelines. The cause of students' creative thinking abilities is low because students consider that mathematics is difficult and not a pleasant lesson. Students also feel bored and bored with the learning process by the teacher who is still dominant using the lecture method. However, these problems can be resolved after the teacher has learned using the STEM approach. Therefore, it can be concluded that the learning process that applies the STEM approach can overcome the low ability of students' creative thinking on the material of curved face three .dimensional .object (cylinder).
References
Apriansyah, D., Ramdani, M., (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa MTs pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 1-7.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunity. Arlington, VI: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.
De La Torre, J. (2011) The Generalized DINA Model Framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179-199.
Gough, D. S. (2014). Exploring Deaf Student Motivation Towards Learning English Literacy. Beaumont: Lamar University.
Hanover, R. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education. Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Washington.DC.U.S: National Academies Press. NW. Suite 300. P202.756.2971 F 866.808.6585.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Pengembangan Analisis Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Maharani, H. R. (2014). Creativity Thinking in Mathematics: Are We Able to Solve Mathematical Problem in a Variety of Way?. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICMSE 2014),120-125.
Manurung & Surya, E. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Al Hidayah Medan. Journal Mathematic Education, 1-15.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standarts for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Research Council. (2014). STEM Learning Is Everywhere: Summary of a Convocation on Building Learning Sysmstems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science and Technology Council. (2013). A Report from The Committee in STEM Education. Washington, D. C. National Science and Technology Council.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.
Office of The Chief Scientist. (2013). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in The National Interest: A Strategic Approach. Canberral Australian Government.
Rasiman. (2019). Peran Pembelajaran Matematika pada Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis di Era Disrupsi. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 4th SENATIK, 1-5. Semarang: FPMIPATI Universitas PGRI Semarang.
Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & Koes H, S. (2016). STEM: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, 976-984. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
